Cancel Preloader

Down the Rabbit Hole: The Surprising Tale of this Bunny Suit

Down the Rabbit Hole: The Surprising Tale of this Bunny Suit

Like Hugh Hefner himself, Playboy’s iconic costume ended up being a mixture of provocative and traditional.

From the very very first problem in 1953, Playboy’s publisher Hugh Hefner desired to differentiate it through the sleazy intercourse mags kept beneath the newsstand countertop and offered in brown paper bags. He once explained in a tuxedo “to include the notion of elegance. he decided on a bunny while the magazine’s mascot “because for the humorous intimate connotation,” but dressed him” The models might have been nude, however the articles had been compiled by acclaimed writers like Norman Mailer, Kurt Vonnegut, Jack Kerouac, and Vladimir Nabokov and covered highbrow topics including “Picasso, Nietzsche, and jazz,” to quote Hefner’s basic editorial. Also JFK read it.

Likewise, as he started their very very first Playboy Club in Chicago in 1960, Hefner emphasized respectability above raunchiness—a preference commonly noted by authors reflecting on their legacy after their death at age 91 the other day. The Playboy Club had been a dinner club, perhaps perhaps not just an intercourse club; coats and ties had been needed. Though only males could possibly be members—or “keyholders,” in Playboy parlance—they could bring feminine visitors. The buffet offered crab feet and filet mignon, and activity had been given by famous brands Nat King Cole, Steve Martin, Aretha Franklin, Billy Crystal, and Sammy Davis, Jr.

The most iconic symbols associated with the Playboy Club had been its waitstaff: a throng of females understood, and dressed, as Bunnies.

Similar to the clubs on their own, the mag whoever title they shared, and also the guy whom created the whole thing, the clothes used by the Playboy Bunnies had been a mixture of provocative and traditional. The Bunny suit—a strapless bodysuit paired with rabbit ears and a fluffy tail—has become a cartoonish clichй of female sexuality, serving as a visual punchline in Bridget Jones’s Diary, Legally Blonde, Mean Girls, The House Bunny, and a host of other rom-coms since its debut. Nevertheless the Bunny’s allure that is erotic just as much of a tease whilst the stuffing that so frequently filled out of the D-cups of her costume. Her suit that is skimpy promised revelations that never ever came; her cuddly demeanor concealed the Bunnies’ circuit training, strict disciplinary policies, and astronomical paychecks. And when feminists continue to be arguing over perhaps the Bunny suit had been constricting or liberating, it is given that it had been made to be both.

In accordance with Kevin Jones, the curator associated with the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising (FIDM) Museum, Hefner initially wanted the club’s waitresses to put on quick, frilly nighties inspired because of the Ziegfeld Follies girls—the intercourse symbols of his youth. But, american marriage agency as recounted in Kathryn Leigh Scott’s memoir The Bunny Years, Playmate Ilse Taurins—who had been dating the organization’s promotions director, Victor Lownes—pointed out that every those flimsy levels is not practical for serving products and cigarettes that are lighting. It absolutely was her concept to dress the waitresses as distaff variations for the magazine’s logo that is masculine. The rabbit became a Bunny, and a symbol came to be (and quickly patented—a first for a service uniform).

The very first prototype—a satin one-piece used more than a prefab Merry Widow corset and paired with bunny ears and a fluffy tail—looked too similar to a swimwear. Several snips for the scissors raised the leg opening, elongating the feet, accentuating the crotch, and getting rid of any resemblance to swimwear. Hefner himself insisted on incorporating the lacing that is criss-cross the top of the leg, stated Jones, who may have a Bunny suit in the museum’s collection. Although the laces had been solely decorative—they couldn’t be untied or loosened—they revealed that so much more epidermis, and advised the tantalizing probability of a wardrobe breakdown. A rosette title label during the right hipbone and dyed-to-match satin pumps finished the ensemble. However it ended up being the addition of a tuxedo that is man’s, bow tie, and cuffs in 1961 that forced the Bunny suit into pop-culture legend.

“Everybody has this notion that the club had been extremely sexually liberated,” Jones said. In fact, it had been pretty place that is tame—a flirting at most of the. Therefore had been the Bunnies. The spouse of 1 keyholder declared the Bunny that is average to “so darn nice and respectable, you’d even allow your sibling marry her.” However, the mixture of overpriced cocktails and underdressed waitresses became a formula that is winning. Clubs multiplied like rabbits; ultimately, there is a lot more than 30 Playboy-branded groups global, in addition to gambling enterprises and resorts.

In their 1963 guide The Presidential Papers, Norman Mailer described the Bunny suit thusly:

a Gay-Nineties rig which exaggerated their hips, bound their waistline . and lifted them in to a phallic breast that is brassiere—each such as the big bullet regarding the front bumper of a Cadillac. Long black stockings, long stockings, up almost towards the waistline for each part, also to the trunk, from the bend associated with the will, just as if ejected tenderly through the human body, ended up being the puff of chastity, only a little ball that is white of bunny’s end which bobbed because they strolled.

It absolutely was a flattering if constricting design; Lownes observed that “the costumes took girls with also normal numbers and made them seem like that they had amazing numbers.” Their remark is telling; only a few Bunnies had been bombshells. The , perhaps not one other way around.

From time one, “the suit had been a throwback,” Jones told me—to the 1950s if you don’t the Gay Nineties. The silhouette that is fashionable of 1960s ended up being boyish, not curvy. Shapeless changes and ballet flats might have been extremely popular in the runway, but in the club, it had been perpetually 1953: hourglass numbers, bullet bras, and heels that are three-inch. The actual only real concessions to fashion had been the Bunnies’ bouffant hairstyles, topped with artfully ears that are angled.

A team of Playboy Bunnies line up for examination by Hugh Hefner, the publisher of Playboy mag, within the room that is main of Playboy Mansion in Chicago. Hefner is inspecting the latest enhanced fabric for the costumes. (Bettmann / Getty Pictures)

Early site visitors to your Playboy Club picked through to its dynamic that is heady of and nice

Newsweek called it “a Disneyland for grownups.” Accordingly, the gown code for feminine workers had been in the same way strict and step-by-step while the enjoyment park’s famously rigid standards that are sartorial. Every thing had been spelled down in careful information in a Bunny handbook and enforced by way of a Bunny mom, whom inspected each Bunny from mind to toe before her shift. Weight and makeup had been closely supervised. Nail enamel, jewelry, and eyeglasses had been strictly forbidden, though hairpieces had been motivated. Cuffs and collars needed to be spotless and starched; the bunny logo cufflinks had to “kiss,” or face one another. Bunnies had been in charge of purchasing their particular (tax-deductible) satin pumps and achieving them colored to suit their matches and ears, which arrived in 12 various colors. “Our set is actually telling as it’s entirely spattered with spilled products,” Jones stated for the costume into the FIDM Museum. “They should have been changed a great deal.” Dirty shoes, laddered stockings, as well as other infractions incurred demerits, which may trigger a Bunny being fined and even fired.

Not even close to being exploited, the Bunnies “were really well protected women that are young” Jones said. They might are attention candy, nevertheless they had been supposed to be (literally) untouchable. Bouncers kept tipsy keyholders from groping or getting tails. (the yarn that is original had been changed by fire-retardant fake fur by 1969 because “customers had been constantly wanting to light them,” Bunny Alice Nichols recalled within the Bunny Years.) Touching a Bunny ended up being grounds for expulsion. And Bunnies were strictly forbidden from dating clients, entertainers, or any C-suite level Playboy workers. They didn’t require sugar daddies, anyway—they made more in tips in one single evening than the usual salesgirl at Bloomingdale’s will make in 2 months, in accordance with Scott.

Certainly, the Bunnies’ bare, buxom image had been constantly an impression. The suit just arrived in 2 cup sizes: 34D and 36D. But those cups had been built with pouches to facilitate stuffing. (In “A Bunny’s Tale,” her 1963 exposй for Show mag, undercover Bunny Gloria Steinem recalled the club’s wardrobe that is in-house telling her that “just about everybody things” while shoving a complete plastic dry cleansing bag down the front side of her suit.) Bunnies are not permitted to flex ahead, lest their assets (or stuffing) spill down in a tawdry display; whatever the case, the suit’s tight, boned bodice would have managed to make it uncomfortable. Rather, these were taught to perform a number of elegant, unnatural techniques for instance the “Bunny Dip” and also the Crouch that is“Bunny permitted them to just take requests and provide beverages without ever bending during the waistline. Though their cleavage had been offered through to a satin platter, Bunnies were cinched in and covered up through the upper body down, putting on sheer Danskin that is black pantyhose flesh-toned Danskin tights, based on Jones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *